📑 In This Article
Overview
Approximately 90% of drug candidates that enter clinical trials fail — a significant portion not because of insufficient potency, but because of poor pharmacokinetics and toxicity. The good news: many of these failures can be predicted computationally, before any synthesis or animal testing. SwissADME is the most widely used free web tool for ADMET prediction — this guide walks you through every parameter and how to interpret results.
💊 What is ADMET?
These properties collectively determine a molecule's pharmacokinetic (PK) profile — whether a drug gets to where it needs to be, in sufficient concentration, for long enough, without causing harm.
📐 Lipinski's Rule of Five — The Foundation
Before SwissADME, the standard filter was Lipinski's Rule of Five (1997) — simple physicochemical limits derived from known oral drugs. A molecule violating more than one rule is unlikely to be orally bioavailable.
Molecular Weight (MW)
Affects membrane permeability and bioavailability
Lipophilicity
Octanol-water partition — controls membrane crossing ability
H-Bond Donors
Excess donors significantly reduce oral absorption
H-Bond Acceptors
Affects solubility and membrane permeability
Biological macromolecules (peptides, natural products, antibiotics) are well-known exceptions. Rule of Five applies specifically to small-molecule oral drugs.
🌐 Using SwissADME Step by Step
Access SwissADME
Go to swissadme.ch — no registration required. Completely free.
Enter Your Molecule
Paste a SMILES string for your compound. Get SMILES from PubChem, ChEMBL, or draw in ChemDraw.
Run the Analysis
Click "Run" — results in seconds. Analyse up to 10 molecules simultaneously for batch comparison.
Interpret the Output
Results organized into: Physicochemistry, Lipophilicity, Water Solubility, Pharmacokinetics, Druglikeness, and Medicinal Chemistry.
In PubChem: search → "Canonical SMILES" in Properties. In ChemDraw: Edit → Copy As → SMILES. Marvin Sketch also lets you draw and export SMILES online.
📊 Key Parameters to Evaluate
Physicochemistry
| Parameter | Ideal Range | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Molecular Weight | 150–500 Da | Affects membrane permeability and bioavailability |
| LogP (iLOGP) | 0–5 | Lipophilicity determines membrane crossing ability |
| H-Bond Donors | ≤ 5 | Excess H-bond donors reduce oral absorption |
| H-Bond Acceptors | ≤ 10 | Affects solubility and permeability |
| Rotatable Bonds | ≤ 10 | Too flexible = poor oral bioavailability |
| TPSA | < 140 Ų | High TPSA = poor permeability; <90 Ų required for CNS drugs |
Water Solubility (ESOL)
Poor solubility is one of the most common reasons drug candidates fail. SwissADME predicts aqueous solubility using ESOL, Ali, and SILICOS-IT methods:
| Solubility Class | LogS Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Highly soluble | LogS > −1 | ✅ Excellent |
| Soluble | −1 to −2 | ✅ Good |
| Moderately soluble | −2 to −4 | ⚠️ Acceptable |
| Poorly soluble | −4 to −6 | ❌ Risky |
| Insoluble | LogS < −6 | ❌ Problematic |
Pharmacokinetics — Key Predictions
If SwissADME predicts inhibition of CYP3A4, CYP2D6, or CYP2C9, this is a serious red flag. These enzymes metabolize most drugs on the market, and inhibition causes dangerous drug-drug interactions.
Druglikeness Scores
Rule of Five
0 or 1 violation = drug-like. Gold standard for oral small-molecule candidates.
Oral Bioavailability
Rotatable bonds ≤10 + TPSA ≤140 Ų — predicts oral bioavailability independently of Lipinski.
Passive Absorption
TPSA ≤ 131.6 Ų + LogP ≤ 5.88 — predicts human intestinal absorption.
Oral Probability
Range 0.11 to 0.55 — probability of ≥10% oral bioavailability in rat models.
🔬 Going Deeper with ADMETsar
ADMETsar (admetsar.scbdd.com) provides more comprehensive toxicity predictions that complement SwissADME, particularly for safety-critical endpoints:
🔄 Integrating ADMET into Your Docking Workflow
Screen for Drug-Likeness First
Apply Lipinski/Veber filters to your virtual library before docking to save computation time and reduce false positives.
Dock the Filtered Library
Only dock compounds that pass ADMET pre-filters — dramatically reduces the hit list to meaningful candidates.
Run ADMET on Top Hits
For compounds with strong binding affinity, run full ADMET profiling to identify pharmacokinetic liabilities.
Prioritize by Multi-Parameter Score
Best candidates balance potency (docking score) with drug-likeness AND safety profile simultaneously.
🚩 Instant Rejection Criteria
Immediately deprioritize any compound that meets any of the following: